Skip to content
  • 最新
  • Categories
  • 东岳流体
  • 随机看[请狂点我]
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
CFD中文网

CFD中文网

  1. CFD中文网
  2. OpenFOAM
  3. 结构网格求解器与非结构网格求解器的区别

结构网格求解器与非结构网格求解器的区别

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved OpenFOAM
4 Posts 2 Posters 4.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 我 Offline
    我 Offline
    我是河滩
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    一般来说,结构网格求解器比非结构网格求解器算的快,原因是什么啊?Openfoam能作为结构网格求解器吗?

    动边界

    1 Reply Last reply
  • Z Offline
    Z Offline
    zhangdong
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    OpenFOAM是基于非结构网格的求解器。

    1 Reply Last reply
  • Z Offline
    Z Offline
    zhangdong
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    结构网格的网格有序排列,一般根据网格编号就能知道网格大概位置。非结构网格则没有这种顺序。
    至于哪种求解器更快也不太好说,要拿具体算例来比较。结构网格的并行优化更成熟一些,有许多成熟算法。对于大规模计算问题可能会好一些。
    以航空航天CFD为例,CFL3D是结构网格求解器,SU2就是非结构求解器。
    以上只是一些浅显的认识。

    我 1 Reply Last reply
  • 我 Offline
    我 Offline
    我是河滩
    replied to zhangdong on last edited by
    #4

    @zhangdong 谢谢

    动边界

    1 Reply Last reply

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • 最新
  • Categories
  • 东岳流体
  • 随机看[请狂点我]